
Journal Entry March 26th 2012
They had come out in support of their boy; a bunch of demi-carnies who hadn't seen a fresh vegetable in generations.* Pockmarked and a bit huge, they lumbered into the public gallery. It was hard to think he might be the good looking one of the family. They looked at me. Their expressions were blank, but it's fair to say I could not be their favourite person.
'If they try anything,' said one police officer encouragingly, 'I'll arrest the lot, the whole blimmin' family, for witness intimidation, and they can spend the night in the cells and think about it.' But they didn't. They may not even have thought bad things about me. One man with short white hair watched me a long time, blue eyes blinking now and then.
Counsel for the prosecution was a beautiful woman, vivacious black eyes, silver earings and high heels to die for. I took one look at her face, so smart and glowing, and knew we would be all right.
'Before we start,' she said, 'I want to tell you how much I admire you...' and she went on to say lovely things that no-one needs to hear except me. Then came the words I dreaded.
'I must warn you,' she said, 'Though this is not a trial, I will be graphic, to give a clear indication of what has happened.' I told her it would be all right, if I needed to cry I would cry. Haven't I written the story many times, to get over it, to make it just a thing I tell? But it is not the same. It is not just a thing I tell.
Oh, but when they brought him into the dock! I felt faint and sick the moment I recognised his face. He is bigger in real life than in my head's retelling. There he stood, not the junkie ratman I had fought, skin and bone and covered in my blood. Three months of prison fare, as opposed to his preferred intake of heroin, crack cocaine and methadone, have done him good. Filled out a little, his face broadened, he looked stronger, clean cut and respectful, in a pale shirt and dark trousers. How the hell did I wrestle a knife off this man? He never looked towards us, and after a while, I had to pay close attention to all that was being said.
[Details of perpetrator, cut for privacy] He had not committed burglary in a domicile since the mid '90s. He had no past record of violence, and no past record of sexual offending. Like the lucky girl I am, I was his first stab at that.
Months ago, when told about his lack of prior sexual offences. I had burst into tears in front of the detective. 'What's wrong with me then?' I blubbered, envisaging a jury eyeballing me and wondering the same. 'There's nothing wrong with you,' He said. 'You were naked and he took a chance.'
But it seemed strange to me that the defendant had done this, knowing the law so much better than I did. 'I've been inside for certain...offences...before,' he had told me that night, 'But never for anything sexual, never for anything like this.' As though he was confiding to a friend over a pint in a pub, 'I've got to have that knife, it's covered with my DNA. I'm looking at 10 years without it. So I've nothing to lose...'
How could one so lucid suddenly lose the plot, blow his lifetime modus operandi of nick-and-bolt, break into a house for the first time in over a decade and attack a woman with a knife, trying to make her perform sexual acts for him? No wonder his family looked at me.
It was mentioned that this case was unusual in many ways, the most being my readiness to fight, but also, the strange periods of conversation between attacks, his seemingly fulsome remorse and the validations of character that had been written for him by a series of women who knew him and described him as a calm man. These references had gone to the court, and the judge had read them. The defendant had wanted to write a letter to me! To get that in the post! It would have been like peeking through the letterbox and seeing his eyes staring back at me. He had been told it was not to be, and thus his own letter had gone to the court.
His defence counsel did not attempt to deny the charges. They were respectful towards me, and ready to accept all I had said in my statements. He apparently could not remember much of that night; he had been recovering from heroin addiction for years, and together with his brother, had been nursing his dying father for 18 months. His father died in the summer at which point he turned to alcohol. He had never been a drinker before. (Defence didn't quite say 'It wuz the boooooze wot did it, yer 'onner!' But it was close...) The night he broke in, he had taken nearly an entire packet of temazepan plus a wellie's worth of brew. This, argued the Defence, transformed him into the maniac who did all this damage and couldn't remember any of it.
I had been very close to this guy, and my sense of smell is good, almost acute. I didn't get a whiff of alcohol off him that night. He smelled of nothing at all. And for a man so puzzled, he had been very swift to plead guilty to crimes contrary to his nature and his memory; possibly because he and his counsel must have recognised that nothing good could come of having my 999 call being played out to a jury.
I wanted to get all those women who knew him so well, and were confident enough of his character to write to the judge, yes and his daughter and his stepdaughter and his mother, and his sister, and let them hear that tape, me screaming for my life down the phone, him kicking the door in as he yelled obscenities, and see them write then. 'Women!' He had spat at me. They might think him a decent man, that night he thought nothing of them. And neither do I.
The Defence agreed that he should do a substantial amount of time for his crimes; what they wanted to argue against was the IPP** that the police wanted as part of his sentence, and the conclusions arrived at by the pre-sentencing report. In that report, the recorder felt that the defendant blamed me for being naked in my bed, inflaming him. The Defence insisted that this was not at all what the defendant intended to say; he was searching for reasons in his own mind as to why he might have done it, and could arrive at none. This had clearly come across badly in the videolink interview.
The judge felt that there was not enough proof of ongoing danger to the public for an IPP; but he also felt that current prescribed sentence lengths for what had happened were insufficient. The defendant had not raped me, nor had he even reached my erogenous zones, but he tried repeatedly, and he also tried to arm himself three times, once with a carving knife, once with a steak knife and once with a Live Action Role-Playing sword***. The sentence for both aggravated burglary and sexual assault was 18 years, knocked down to 12 for an early guilty plea, saving us all the trauma of a trial. He will serve half of that, and then be let out. If he is arrested after that, he goes back in and serves the rest.
This was accounted steep; Prosecution told me that he might appeal, but that even if he did, it would not go down by more than a year. 'He will go on the sex offenders list for life,' she said, 'And he will not have a pleasant time. He knows how other prisoners treat sex offenders.' She also had one final message for me from the Defence; in the estimation of her learned colleague, the defendant's remorse was genuine. Again it was said that the depth and sincerity of his contrition seemed unusual. 'Make of that what you will,' said the Prosecution.
For the first time, I wanted to go over to the Defence Counsel and crack her head out of her wig.
Stop it! I wanted to scream at her, What, is this bloke some ladykiller, haha, that every woman around him wants to tell me what a nice guy he is? Sometimes I wake in the middle of the night and I believe there is no-one who hears me in the whole world. I thought I was going to die that night. I practice with carving knives, and I cry for no reason. Sorry? Of course he's sorry. He's sorry he's in the dock, he's sorry his life is in this mess, he'll say anything and of course you want to believe him cos that's your job! Well, all right, do your job and be paid well, but don't come to me trying to feel good about it!
There, that's the shrill truth of me. I felt faint at the sentencing, and even now am dizzy when I think about it. For a man who broke in, threatened me with a knife, stole stuff and tried to rape me, this sentence seems just and fair. For a man who has never harmed a woman before, went off on the biggest bender of his life, is genuinely disgusted at himself and sorry for the pain he has caused, this seems like hell, deserved according to his actions if not his motives, but still hell. And I feel it.
I feel for him.
I don't know the truth of what or who this man really is. It is good that no other person faces what I have faced, for 5 or 6 years at least. After all this, I am going to be all right, I know it. But I am so sorry we ever met, and not just because it hurt me.
Oh Mr. Try to be well.
THE END
* It is just possible that his family were not all entirely hideous carnies. I was a little angry at the time...
** An IPP means imprisonment for public protection. These sentences have to be served in full, but that doesn’t mean automatic release afterwards; the prisoner must prove that he is not a public danger and this can take years to ascertain. There is a lot of controversy about these sentences.
****A replica of a weapon made from latex based around a fibre-glass tube.
**** As we see, I was no kinder to the Defence than to his family. Still, at least I didn't actually say these things.